{"id":280,"date":"2014-04-22T08:30:42","date_gmt":"2014-04-22T13:30:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/computationalcomplexity.org\/forum\/?page_id=280"},"modified":"2014-06-06T08:39:41","modified_gmt":"2014-06-06T13:39:41","slug":"results-of-the-vote","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/computationalcomplexity.org\/forum\/results-of-the-vote\/","title":{"rendered":"Results of the Vote"},"content":{"rendered":"<table class=\"forumIndent\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width:10px\"><\/td>\n<td><em>April 22, 2014 &copy; <a class=\"forumEmail\" href=\"mailto:dieter@cs.wisc.edu\">Dieter van Melkebeek<\/a><br \/>\n<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Everyone on the CCC mailing list had one vote. There are about 500 people on the mailing list. (We don&#8217;t know the exact number because some people are subscribed through multiple addresses; every person could only vote once). 189 people cast their vote.<\/p>\n<p>Here are the numerical results:<\/p>\n<p>In the current situation, which of the following options do you consider best for CCC? [189 responses]<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li> 3%: Remaining IEEE-only\n<li> 38%: Becoming joint ACM\/IEEE\n<li> 60%: Going solo\n<\/ol>\n<p>In case you answered 1 or 2, please check the main reason: [89 responses]<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li> 34%: Prestige of being affiliated with a professional organization\n<li> 22%: Financial backing and insurance\n<li> 13%: Having proceedings in the digital library of a professional organization\n<li> 12%: Maintaining continuity\n<li> 18%: Other\n<\/ul>\n<p>In case you answered 3, please check the main reason: [121 responses]<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li> 43%: Open and free access to the proceedings\n<li> 21%: Reducing monetary costs for the attendees\n<li> 15%: Increased flexibility\n<li> 7%: Reducing time costs for the local organizers\n<li> 14%:Other\n<\/ul>\n<p>Independent of how you voted on 1-3, would you be willing to help out as a volunteer in the event that CCC does go solo? [189 responses]<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li> 53%: Maybe\n<li> 30%: No\n<li> 17%: Yes\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>April 22, 2014 &copy; Dieter van Melkebeek Everyone on the CCC mailing list had one vote. There are about 500 people on the mailing list. (We don&#8217;t know the exact number because some people are subscribed through multiple addresses; every person could only vote once). 189 people cast their vote. Here are the numerical results: [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/computationalcomplexity.org\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/280"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/computationalcomplexity.org\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/computationalcomplexity.org\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/computationalcomplexity.org\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/computationalcomplexity.org\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=280"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/computationalcomplexity.org\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/280\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":331,"href":"https:\/\/computationalcomplexity.org\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/280\/revisions\/331"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/computationalcomplexity.org\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=280"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}